How can I appeal the outcome of an academic misconduct process?
That staff or bodies have failed to follow regulations and/or procedures or have failed to follow them with due care
That staff or bodies have shown bias or prejudice towards you in the way they have made the relevant decision
That relevant new evidence has become available that should be considered and there are valid reasons why it was not provided earlier
That the decision was unreasonable and/or the penalty imposed was not proportionate in all of the circumstances.
The University will not consider an appeal in the following situations:
Academic Judgement: an appeal against a decision where only the opinion of academic expert(s) will suffice is deemed to be a challenge to academic judgement and will not be considered.
Decision Not Yet Made or Confirmed: the University will not consider an appeal where it can be shown, at any stage that the decision against which the appeal is directed has yet to be made or, if made, has yet to be confirmed.
Duplicate Appeals: an appeal will not be considered where the substance of the appeal can be shown to relate to a matter that has already been the subject of an appeal by you that is in progress or has been decided.
Dishonest or Unreasonable Appeals: if, at any stage during the appeal process, it is found that the evidence put forward to support the appeal can be shown to have been acquired dishonestly or is itself dishonest and/or can be shown to be an unreasonable demand or an unreasonable persistence the appeal will be closed and the evidence submitted to the University's disciplinary procedures.
If you are unable to access Surrey Support, please contact us via our enquiry form.